Analysis of State of Massachusetts on North American Free Trade Essay

Analysis of State of Massachusetts on North American Free Trade Agreement - Essay ExampleThe support for NAFTA trade pact was not universally agreed throughout the USA (Earl, 192). As a matter of fact, it is one of the most controversial sheers that befool survived over the two decades. This is owing to the economic impacts that it has created in the country, where some $ billion worth of businesses are predicted to collapse shifted to both Canada or Mexico, while over 1 million jobs are also predicted to have been lost, since the signing and commencement of the murder of the NAFTA trade pact in 1993 (Mishel and Teixeira, 7). The northern districts and the central districts of the USA were particularly irrelevant to this murder, owing to the fact that they formed the bulk of the manufacturing zone in the country, and thus feared the loss of jobs and manufacturing business to either Mexico or Canada (Glick, 198). On the other hand, the southern states and part of the northern states, especially those on the borders were supportive of the implementation of the NAFTA trade pact.Thus, the vote on the North American Free Trade Agreement was an almost every bit divisive issue for Democrats senators during the vote in 1993, where 27 democrat senators voted for the NAFTA implementation, while 28 of the Democrat senators voted against its implementation (Earle, 193). The most notable occurrence, however, is that both the Democrat senators from the State of Massachusetts voted for the implementation of the NAFTA trade agreement, despite the issue macrocosm highly divisive.At the time of signing this agreement, President Clinton ratified it while still being opposed by 60% of his Democrat counterparts in the legislature, meaning that he got more support from the Republicans than the Democrats, which is a highly unusual scenario (Rosenbaum, n.p.). This simply serves to indicate two major points.